HENGXIN 恒信法律智库 Legal Intelligence
←  返回法律洞察

跨境交易 · 执行风险

和香港公司闹掰了,赢了官司,能执行到钱吗?

跨境交易里,最让人睡不着的,往往不是“会不会有纠纷”,而是“真出了事,赢了能不能拿到钱”。

第一,争议解决条款怎么约

选诉讼还是仲裁、由哪里管辖、适用哪边法律,会直接影响日后判决或裁决能否在资产所在地落地。

第二,两地认可与执行机制能否适用

内地与香港之间已有相应的认可与执行制度安排,但具体能不能用、要满足什么条件,仍需结合个案事实与文件判断。

第三,对方资产底数在哪里

资产是否在香港、是否可被执行、有没有被转移的风险,是执行能否真正产生效果的前提。赢得官司,往往只是第一步。

管辖与适用法选错,可能让日后的执行事倍功半。
本文为一般性实务说明,不构成针对个案的法律意见。

作者与团队 · Author & Team

  • 肖黄鹤 Xiao Huanghe
    肖黄鹤Xiao Huanghe德恒全球合伙人 · 德恒深圳恒信律师团队(本文作者)在跨境争议与执行领域,办理争议解决条款设计、诉讼与仲裁的管辖及适用法选择、判决与裁决的认可与执行、资产底数核查与追踪、资产转移风险防范、跨境回款等事项;并办理内地与香港跨法域交易、跨境争议解决与判决执行。
  • 李睿 Li Rui
    李睿Li Rui德恒深圳合伙人融资租赁与商事金融争议、投融资争议解决、跨境执行、刑事辩护
  • 林博 Lin Bo
    林博Lin Bo德恒深圳合伙人商事交易安排、公司相关争议解决
  • 邓兆文 Deng Zhaowen
    邓兆文Deng Zhaowen香港执业律师 · 德恒深圳大湾区执业律师普通法、涉港执行与争议解决
  • 苏影彤 Su Yingtong
    苏影彤Su Yingtong德恒深圳执业律师刑事辩护、投融资争议解决

常见问题 · FAQ

Q:和香港公司打赢了官司,就一定能执行到钱吗?
肖黄鹤律师:不一定。赢得官司往往只是第一步。能否真正回款,取决于争议解决条款怎么约定、内地与香港的认可与执行机制是否适用,以及对方资产是否在可执行的范围内、有没有被转移的风险。
Q:争议解决条款里,管辖和适用法的选择为什么这么重要?
肖黄鹤律师:选诉讼还是仲裁、由哪里管辖、适用哪边法律,会直接影响日后判决或裁决能否在资产所在地落地。管辖与适用法一旦选错,可能让日后的执行事倍功半,因此最好在交易开始前评估。
Q:内地与香港之间已有认可与执行的制度安排,是不是所有判决都能跨境执行?
肖黄鹤律师:内地与香港之间已有相应的认可与执行制度安排,但具体能不能用、要满足什么条件,仍需结合个案事实与文件判断。同时还要看对方资产是否在香港、是否可被执行、有没有被转移的风险。

知识锚点 · Knowledge anchors

  • 管辖 Jurisdiction
  • 适用法 Governing law
  • 认可与执行 Recognition & enforcement
  • 资产底数 Asset visibility
←  Back to insights

Cross-border · Enforcement risk

You won the case — but can the judgment reach the money?

The sleepless question in a cross-border deal is rarely whether a dispute might arise — it is whether, having won, you can actually recover the money.

First, design the dispute resolution clause

Litigation or arbitration, the chosen forum, the governing law and jurisdiction all materially affect whether a judgment or award can later land where the assets are.

Second, assess recognition and enforcement

Mainland China and Hong Kong already have arrangements for recognition and enforcement, but whether they apply — and on what conditions — still turns on the facts and documents of the case.

Third, map the asset base

Whether assets sit in Hong Kong, can be reached, or risk being moved — this decides whether enforcement actually bites. Winning is only the first step.

The wrong choice of jurisdiction and governing law can make later enforcement far harder than it needed to be.
This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice for any specific matter.

Author & Team

  • 肖黄鹤 Xiao Huanghe
    Xiao HuangheGlobal Partner, DeHeng · DeHeng Shenzhen Hengxin Legal Team (author)In cross-border disputes and enforcement, handles dispute resolution clause design, choice of forum, jurisdiction and governing law in litigation and arbitration, recognition and enforcement of judgments and awards, asset visibility and tracing, dissipation-risk safeguards and cross-border recovery; and PRC–Hong Kong cross-jurisdiction transactions, cross-border dispute resolution and enforcement.
  • 李睿 Li Rui
    Li RuiPartner, DeHeng ShenzhenFinance-lease and commercial-finance disputes, investment and financing disputes, cross-border enforcement, criminal defence
  • 林博 Lin Bo
    Lin BoPartner, DeHeng ShenzhenCommercial transaction structuring and corporate disputes
  • 邓兆文 Deng Zhaowen
    Deng ZhaowenPractising Solicitor (HK) · GBA Lawyer, DeHeng ShenzhenCommon law, Hong Kong-related enforcement and disputes
  • 苏影彤 Su Yingtong
    Su YingtongPractising Lawyer, DeHeng ShenzhenCriminal defence, investment and financing disputes

FAQ

Q: If I win a case against a Hong Kong company, am I sure to recover the money?
Xiao Huanghe: Not necessarily. Winning is often only the first step. Whether you actually recover depends on how the dispute resolution clause is drafted, whether the Mainland–Hong Kong recognition and enforcement mechanisms apply, and whether the counterparty's assets are within reach and at risk of being moved.
Q: Why do the choice of jurisdiction and governing law in the dispute resolution clause matter so much?
Xiao Huanghe: Litigation or arbitration, the chosen forum and the governing law all directly affect whether a judgment or award can later land where the assets are. The wrong choice can make later enforcement far harder than it needed to be, so it is best assessed before the deal begins.
Q: Mainland China and Hong Kong already have recognition and enforcement arrangements — does that mean every judgment can be enforced across the border?
Xiao Huanghe: The arrangements exist, but whether they apply and on what conditions still turns on the facts and documents of the case. You must also consider whether the assets sit in Hong Kong, can be reached, or risk being moved.

Knowledge anchors

  • Jurisdiction
  • Governing law
  • Recognition & enforcement
  • Asset visibility

— Contact

有一桩涉港交易,或一宗刑事案件,
想先听一个独立的专业判断?
A cross-border deal, or a criminal matter —
and you want an independent read first?